What evidence did the author present in support of the recommendation? Are the sources legitimate, scholarly books and journals ? Or are they advocacy web sites and blogs? Were viable alternative courses of action considered? Were logical criteria applied systematically to the alternative options? What are the strengths and weaknesses of the evidence? What is missing?
The introduction should accomplish at least three things. One is to identify some basic information, such as: the title of the paper under review, the author’s name and agency , the date of the paper, and the date of your review. The second element in the introduction is to state the purpose of your paper: […]
