Does the paper include the student’s reflective thought about his/her professional competencies and attitudes regarding each theme?
Are statements of both personal strengths and weaknesses in evidence?
Is a realistic growth plan proposed?
How does the paper reflect the student’s evaluation of the benefits and advantages to be gained by organizations that engage in strategic thinking and planning?
How does the paper reflect the student’s understanding of when and how strategic thinking, planning, and execution can go wrong and how to avoid these pitfalls?
Mechanics–Is the paper written? Are APA headers appropriately applied? Is the flow of ideas logical?
Do transitions make the connection between the concepts presented apparent and easy to follow? Has the writer avoided passive voice?
Avoided grammatical and spelling errors?
Are all sources properly cited?
