Do you agree with the decision that the House of Lords made in the case of R v H [2004] 1 All ER 1269 that a court does not have to appoint a special counsel in every case where public interest immunity arises?

Ethics & Common Law Do you agree with the decision that the House of Lords made in the case of R v H [2004] 1 All ER 1269 that a court does not have to appoint a special counsel in every case where public interest immunity arises?

© 2020 Essaylane.com. All Rights Reserved. | Disclaimer: for assistance purposes only. These custom papers should be used with proper reference.