1.‘Bosman and the subsequent case-law on non-discriminatory obstacles in the context of Article 45 TFEU is an example of an incoherent and dangerous judicial activism.
Critically evaluate this statement. Your answer should include a reference to relevant legal provisions, case law and commentary.
2.‘In Zambrano the Court of Justice abandoned the requirement for a cross-border dimension to the enjoyment of Union Citizenship rights’.
Critically discuss this case and the extent to which the CJEU has maintained the same approach in subsequent cases. Your answer should include a reference to relevant legal provisions, case law and commentary.