You will read two articles on Atlantic Piracy, discuss the arguments and ideologies of Pirates in the 18th century through the lens of two different authors Lane and Rediker.
Considering their general overlap and their differences, what would you define as the shared area of focus of these two sources?
What is the argument made by the first reading within that focus area?
What is the argument made by the second reading within that focus area?
Does the first author have any significant objectives or make any sub-arguments outside of the main argument made in the first reading?
Does the second author have any significant objectives or make any sub-arguments outside of the main argument made in the first reading?
