Peer Review Prompt Questions
1.How successful is the introduction? Is there an explicit thesis statement? If you can find the thesis, what is it? If you cannot find the thesis, what suggestions can you make?
2.What parts of the author’s rhetoric as the writer noted (e.g., pathos, ethos, logos, assumptions, etc.)? Are these elements properly identified and their impact analyzed? Can you make any suggestions for further analysis?
3.How well does the writer present evidence to support judgments about the subject? Can you identify any passages where more?
4.Are there any places where the writing feels disjointed or lacks coherence?
5.Discuss the tone and stance of the writing. Are they appropriate for the intended audience? Would you recommend any changes in language?
6.Other than the items listed above, what is at least one significant change that you would suggest to the writer?
