In the form of a memo, review this case: “This American Life The Right to Remain Silent, Part 2 http://www.thisamericanlife.org/radio-archives/episode/414/right-to-remain-silent” and form a managerial decision or policy solution (classical approach or human relations school approach. Has Compstat been worth it? Should it continue?
The memo should contain the following criteria:
1. Start with a short opening paragraph that summarizes the problem and briefly describes why this problem matters. (1 paragraph)
o What is the central dilemma or problem in the case?
o Think why it matters (or why this is an issue in your opinion)
2. After identifying the problem, analyze the case. (2-3 paragraphs)
o Think about linking a (specific) case to a (broader) theory. Use a well-understood theory as a lens to look into a practical case.
o Focus on/use case detail to support your claim and to show causal process in action. Good arguments usually require a close and insightful reading of the case.
o Use readings as warrants: readings will be employed in a way that strengthened your argument. For example, if you identify leadership problems in a case and you would like to make a good claim why they matter and how to resolve the issues, you will need to rely on leadership literature (aka. readings in leadership) to support your argument. In doing so, it will help you to generalize your arguments.
o You must take account of the pros and cons of the approach you are recommending, supporting your answer with evidence from the case and theoretical insights from the readings.
o Suggest general solutions based on your analysis.
3. Provide a short conclusion that restates why you come to that conclusion. (1 paragraph)
o Based on your analysis, what are the general solutions and suggestions? And why they are important?
o What does it mean for public managers and policymakers (generally practitioners)?
