Assignment:
1. In the introduction: Describe Wiesenthal’s dilemma in two to four sentences as presented in Book 1 of the text (pages1-98).
Explain what you think is the central issue in Wiesenthal’s dilemma (for example, whether Wiesenthal should have forgiven Karl, or whether Karl deserved forgiveness, or what Wiesenthal’s silence meant).
Name three respondents you’ll discuss from Book 2, what they have in common about the issue, and why you’ve chosen to discuss them.
2. In each body paragraph: 1) Explain the position of one respondent; 2) Analyze and respond to his or her thoughts in two or three sentences; and 3) e
3. In the concluding paragraphs: Describe how you would have responded to Wiesenthal’s dilemma in a return to your thesis idea.
1. Did the authors respond to Wiesenthal’s question or did they respond to a different question, in effect reframing the central issue?
2. What are the major areas of disagreement? Your selection of responders should include at least some level of disagreement with one another and with your views, but also be connected by some similar considerations.
3. Do any of the concepts you discuss in your essay correspond to issues discussed in Think Chapter 9, Ethical and Moral Reasoning?Does the chapter provide any insight on how Wiesenthal could have developed a response to Karl?
